HDR Photography Intro

1. What manipulations to the camera will you need to make to create an HDR image?
You will have to adjust the camera for each shot if your camera  doesn't have a auto exposure bracketing function.
2. What equipment will we use to take this type of image?
A camera preferably with an Auto Exposure Bracketing function, a tripod, HDR blending software, and a large memory card. 
3. What is the reason someone might take an HDR image?
To get a cool blurred affect on one's photograph. A person could want a high-contrast scene and a way to do this is with shooting HDR photographs.
4. What can we expect to happen with the images once we merge them together, what will we see that we might not have seen with just one photo?
You can expect a specific style of photo with an unusually high dynamic range that couldn't otherwise be achieved in a single photograph. If the pictures don't line up the final product will come out looking weird. 

Infographics and Illustrator

Current Presidential Politics

Freshman Letters

The Fit Bit

Infographics

Untitled infographic
Create line charts

Final Exam Preview

1.) Summarize what you watched and read about - let's say 2-3 paragraphs of 3-4 sentences

I learned a lot about the basics of iMovie and what the program can do. A person can use iMovie by dragging and dropping images and videos. With iMovie you can speed up and slow down footage making the website professional.

2.) Tell me one thing that you already knew about iMovie that the website explained

I already knew that iMovie had themes that have titles and transitions. The website did explain this early on in the article. 

3.) Tell me one thing that you learned new today that you didn’t know before.

I learned that you can record narration directly on the application, which I didn't know before. This piece of information will help me later on because I have to narrate my movie.

4.) What are you concerned about with this final project?

I'm concerned my movie might look basic and poorly done. Also I am worried about incorporating pictures with the video.

5.) What are you confident you can complete early and have ready to use?

Nothing really, but I am confident that I now know how to use iMovie. Hopefully I can figure out the rest of my project soon.

6.) If I asked you today, what do you think you will do for your video?

I am still not sure, but I am thinking of doing a documentary style for my movie.

SNO Online Papers

1. Who wrote the story?

Aiososa Omere.

2. What is their story about?

This story is about the holiday Valentine's day and what the day is all about and the controversy surrounding it, the importance of this day of love and/or the lack of it. The author tells her opinion of the holiday in this article. 

3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote it directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.

The author feels that this holiday is annoying and , "shouldn't be celebrated at all." She thinks the day is unnecessary and, "Love is too rich of a feeling to be cheapened by lacy dollies and cheesy cards." Overall, the author suggests that Valentines day should not make single people feel bad about themselves and couples should not need cooperate America tell them when to profess their love for each other.

4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic?

The author briefly mentions the other side of this topic, the positive side of the holiday. That Valentine's day is a nice holiday that brings couples together.

5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.
This article was not wishy-washy. The author had a strong opinion about the topic, which she clearly showed.

The author only states her opinion.

6. Are there any quotes in the story?

There are no quotes in this story.

7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd or 3rd)?

The article was written with a 3rd person point of view. Though it felt like a first person article because of the author's obvious opinions in the text.

1. Who wrote the story?

Jake Manderson and Charlie Turner.

2. What is their story about?

Their story is about whether it is appropriate to call others retarded. 

3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote it directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.
The pair agrees that using the word retarded is inappropriate and hurtful, "this word alienates people with learning disabilities as inferior as those without."

The author feels like schools should provide test-optional applications to accommodate for all types of students. 

4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic?

They do mention the other side of the debate, that it's just a word and people should not take it seriously. They do counter this though.

5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.

This article as far as I could see, is not wishy-washy. They clearly stated why their arguments are superior.

6. Are there any quotes in the story?

Yes, there are lots of quotes from students and the peace club.

7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd or 3rd)?
This story was written in 3rd person.

1. Who wrote the story?

Kevin Booza

2. What is their story about?

This story is about whether gun rights are more important than gun control and vice versa. 

3. What is their direct opinion about that topic? Please quote it directly from the story or do a really good job of paraphrasing.

The author believes that gun control is more important than gun rights, "the bad in criminals will always outweigh the good in responsible gun owners." He feels that gun control outweighs the need for gun rights.

4. Did they address what the other side might think about their topic?

The author did address the other side of this topic, that people feel like it's there right to own firearms to feel safe.

5. Were they wishy-washy with their opinion? By this I mean did they every go back and say well maybe if this were to happen, then their opinion wouldn't be valid. Support your opinion.

I don't think this article was wishy-washy. The author stated both sides of the argument but made it clear which side was superior.

6. Are there any quotes in the story?

No quotes in this story.

7. What point of view did they write in (1st, 2nd or 3rd)?

Third person.

Personal Essay

1. What was one idea that the writer gave in the Wide Range of Topics section that you can use as you start deciding on a topic?
The author suggests to write about something that you are passionate about and have an opinion on. Also maybe something from your personal experiences.

2. What was one idea the writer gave in the Opinions Pieces section that you should remember as you are writing your piece?
The author says writers should remember to not generalize when you write. To be as specific as possible. Also for writers to put their work in context that gives readers insight to both the small moments and the wider prospective. The author also mentions that to have a compelling essay one must show rather than tell.

3. List three suggestions the writer makes in the Personal Essays and Crafts section that you will use as you write.
The author suggests to avoid philosophical rants, make connections, and to write persuasively. A writer should use the author's advice to be a better writer.

 

My Opinions Story

  Recently, a bill to regulate Uber, Lyft, and similar transportation services was proposed. These services have lately been very popular. According to KUT.org in Austin Texas there have been more than 2.5 million rides from these services since June of 2014. The number of rides in the area has likely only gone up. As these transportation services grow bigger, they should require background checks and do everything they can to keep their passengers safe.

  For most Jobs, background checks are required. One of the reasons why services like Uber/Lyft are so popular and successful is because the companies don't have to go through local regulations. Why should Uber and Lyft services be an exception? Other ground transportation drivers like bus, taxi, and limo drivers, competitors of Uber are fingerprinted. It would only be fair for Uber and Lyft to go through with these necessary safety regulations to generate fair competition and help protect the people.

  Another important reason why I think a bill to regulate transportation services like Uber is necessary is that regulations would help prevent crimes related to ride-hailing drivers. From Pewtrusts.org on November 24, 2015, Attorneys found that just that summer twenty five uber drivers in the two cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles, had criminal records. Regulations would help prevent criminals from being drivers. And decrease the new's reports that keep surfacing of crimes committed by ride-hailing drivers.

  Someone against the idea of a regulation of Uber/Lyft could point out that regulations would not be necessary or fair, because the drivers of these services are not actual employees. It is true Uber drivers are not technically real employees, but Uber is still a growing business that should value their customer's safety.

  Since the start of these transportation services, there has been a series of sexual assault and harassment cases involving Uber and Lyft. Sexual assault and harassment has been an issue in all of the ride-sharing industry, but there is a higher degree of accountability with Taxi drivers, because of their background checks. This bill could help change Uber's process for hiring drivers. Which is currently dangerously negligent.

  A reason why many people are opposed too background checks on Uber/Lyft, is because they think it will cause people to lose their jobs and to not want to work for Uber/Lyft. Some say regulations would defeat the purpose of Uber: a fast ride. But regulations would not destroy Uber's concept, it would just make the business safer for all. Criminals would be discouraged to work for Uber/Lyft because of this initiative. 

 Currently, drivers of services of Uber/Lyft use their own cars that may not have commercial licenses. They also may not have insurance policies that would fully cover anyone that could be injured in accidents. Regulations should be required to ensure the passenger's safety.

  Uber, Lyft, and similar transportation services must improve their safety by having background checks. Safety is important and necessary because millions of people use Uber and Lyft. I think regulations would improve the lives of all involved and better the world.